NASA Could Have Mattered
Posted in space on February 3rd, 2010 by irv – Be the first to commentIn The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Robert Heinlein’s masterpiece about freedom, revolution and the humor of artificial intelligence, there’s a bit where the lunar colonists throw rocks at the Earth. Big rocks. Gravity makes them into incredibly destructive weapons. The people of Earth can’t do much about it because even getting to the moon is a huge effort. This is a military principle we’ll call the high ground effect, as in when you have the high ground, you have a huge advantage over the other guy. That’s why fighter planes attack from above, why artillery is placed on mountains and why countless battles have been fought over hills (Pork Chop Hill. Bunker hill. etc. etc)
Remember this effect. It will matter soon.
The big news this week is that that misbegotten ground hog has condemned us to another month and a half of global non-warming. Of slightly less import but possibly still newsworthy is that this budget cuts funding for NASA’s shuttle replacement program and for the planned return to the Moon (see here, here , here and here). One obvious point about this: In a budget with a deficit of $1.6+ trillion, the changes being made to NASA are not about the cost-benefit analysis. A budget with such an astronomical deficit is not one where there has been any effort to make the hard budgeting decisions. Just forget that idea. This leads to exactly one conclusion: The cuts to NASA and the narrowing of its mission is an ideological decision. read more »
linkedin
Technorati Favorites