<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to 2044</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/2009/06/welcome-to-2044/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/2009/06/welcome-to-2044/</link>
	<description>Without creativity, the universe would just be columns of numbers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 07:27:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: irv</title>
		<link>http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/2009/06/welcome-to-2044/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>irv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/?p=197#comment-69</guid>
		<description>When I was in high school I developed the opinion that the classics were chosen BECAUSE they had so little value to students. It was a scam to make teachers seem smarter than they were. Maybe I don&#039;t still have that opinion (or maybe I do). 

In the case of 1984 it seems possible that what made it a classic was the cultural significance of the ideas in it, rather than the quality of the writing. If that&#039;s true, then maybe it should be used in history classes, to show the growth of ideas about government and totalitarianism, than in literature classes where it just torments young people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in high school I developed the opinion that the classics were chosen BECAUSE they had so little value to students. It was a scam to make teachers seem smarter than they were. Maybe I don&#8217;t still have that opinion (or maybe I do). </p>
<p>In the case of 1984 it seems possible that what made it a classic was the cultural significance of the ideas in it, rather than the quality of the writing. If that&#8217;s true, then maybe it should be used in history classes, to show the growth of ideas about government and totalitarianism, than in literature classes where it just torments young people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Till</title>
		<link>http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/2009/06/welcome-to-2044/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Till</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/?p=197#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I did have to read 1984, as well as Animal Farm. Parts of 1984 were good from what I remember, but then other parts really drug. I might appreciate the literary value of it more now if I went back and re-read it. You don&#039;t appreciate the classics much in high school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did have to read 1984, as well as Animal Farm. Parts of 1984 were good from what I remember, but then other parts really drug. I might appreciate the literary value of it more now if I went back and re-read it. You don&#8217;t appreciate the classics much in high school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
