Chaos Program

The stream of bad news for newspapers has been almost constant for months. Yesterday, we heard that the New York Times would be cutting pay across the board (New York Times set to impose 5% pay cut on all staff). Last week, Gannett announced 1 week of paid furloughs (2 for higher paid employees) in Q2 of 2009 (Gannett calls for second-quarter furloughs). This is in addition to a week of furloughs imposed on employees in Q1 (where old newspapers go to die). This is exactly the same as a pay cut except with the added bonus of giving people extra free time to stew about it. Who says big companies don’t care about morale?

But wait! There’s hope! US Senator Benjamin Cardin (D-Maryland) (Cardin’s official website) has introduced the Newspaper Revitalization Act, which would allow newspapers to operate as non-profits – That is, as organizations exempt from taxes on their profits because of a stated dedication to a purpose approved by the government as being beneficial to the greater good, as opposed to their common current status as “failing to make a buck in spite of trying REAL HARD.” Apparently the theory is that letting them keep all of the money they make will help them stay healthy (Don’t ask why that doesn’t apply to the rest of us. I don’t know). In order to justify the non-profit designation, papers would no longer be allowed to endorse political candidates (apparently the Senator thinks we don’t know who the papers favor otherwise).
read more »

Thanks to my job at Xerox, I had the fun and interesting experience the other day of answering some questions emailed to me by Amanda Morin, half of the Ruby team at About.com. This is new stuff to me. Some of the questions made me feel like I was doing a midterm in grad school! But the end result is not too bad, though she (probably wisely) cut my comment about scaling Java in comparison to Ruby (anyone who knows me, knows I’m other than a fan of Java).

The basic questions were about Ruby and about Cloud Computing. What do you know but 2 days after answering all those questions, I run across an article that states the obvious but little thought of idea that cloud computing may be a new thing for business but it’s old news for cyber criminals. What do you think a botnet is but a resource cloud? Wish I had seen it before! Oh well, check out the article Botnets and illicit file swapping: the original “cloud computing” and an older take at Cloud Computing: Invented By Criminals, Secured By ???

In addition to interviewing me, Amanda interviewed Hampton Catlin, who (unlike me) really knows what he’s talking about. There’s a series of articles on the subject. Go see the articles. Learn something and make it look like someone out there has an interest in what I have to say (It’s okay to pretend).

Interviews with me

• Cloud Computing and Ruby: Interviewing Dave Vandervort
• What is Cloud Computing? Interviewing Dave Vandervort of Xerox Innovation Group

Other bits of the series (also interesting, though not as much):

• What is Cloud Computing
• Cloud Computing and Ruby: Interviewing Hampton Catlin

updates

3/25/2009: Fixed bad link on “What is Cloud Computing” That was mistakenly pointing to the Hampton Catlin interview.

I ran across an interesting internet hoax yesterday. Apparently, a number of people believed the announcement that Twitter was going to start offering special accounts – for a fee – that would allow both more than the usual 140 character limit on posts and would, apparently, randomly force people to follow these special pay accounts. (For the record, no, I’m not one of the people who fell for it. Really. You believe me don’t you?). See Twitterville Falls For Premium Accounts Hoax for more information.

Poor Twitter. People are making fun of their business model just because they don’t have one!

Let’s just take it as stipulated that Twitter is cool. That’s one of the reasons it gets targeted for silly jokes like that. If you don’t even know what Twitter is, you’re not cool. Sorry. That’s life. Look at The Infection Meme and Twitter to broaden your education. More importantly, it sometimes has value, though not always where you think. And I don’t just mean this: Ohio Cops Use Twitter to Talk to Residents.

One feature of Twitter (apparently not entirely planned by the creators) is the ability to tag posts for subject matter and search on those tags, so that you see what the whole world is saying about a subject, not just the people you personally follow. During the final episode of Battlestar Galactica I posted several items with the tag #BSG, to show that I was talking about BSG. See how it works?
read more »

I usually stay away from the popular news of the day but this one was so funny I had to say something about it: IBM in Talks to Buy Sun in Bid to Add to Web Heft (Note: This link keeps coming up with an excerpt and a “subscribe” link, but when I opened it from Google search results it gave me the whole article. Interesting, huh?). The short version of this is that the two companies are in talks and there’s a possible price tag of $6.5 billion.  As of this writing, no actual deal has been announced. They’re just talking. Interestingly, according to the WSJ article, Sun has been looking for a buyer for some months. This makes sense to me since I’ve considered Sun to be doomed for several years.

I’ve worked with Sun’s Solaris operating system quite a bit. I like it. It’s terrifically stable. In fact, the times when it seemed to fail there was always an underlying hardware problem. Sun hardware is pretty good, too. Some of their Sparc stations run practically forever. That said, I don’t see Solaris to be all that much better than Linux and it costs MUCH more (On any hardware. Linux has been ported to everything except my mailbox but it’s not much of a mailbox). The extra cost for Sun just isn’t worth it.

When I worked at the newspaper the editorial software we put in during my first year ran on Solaris 8 on a pair of V880s the size of one of those mini office refrigerators. At the time, that editorial system depended on Oracle for the db and was not available on Linux. It was a powerful, very stable and fabulously expensive system. That editorial software is now available on Linux. It’s still fabulously expensive but the cost of the hardware and the operating system are a fraction of what they used to be.
read more »

There’s already a new chapter in the story of the alleged confession that Russia was behind the cyber attacks on Estonia in 2007. (See http://www.chaosprg.com/blog/2009/03/the-coming-cyberwars/) for previous discussion. In that post I discussed the (improbable, I thought) claim of a Russian official that his assistant had started the attacks for purely patriotic reasons. Now there’s a new story that the previously unnamed assistant has come forward and said it’s true, and added some fascinating details.

In an article by Charles Clover in the Financial Times (Kremlin-backed group behind Estonia cyber blitz), the assistant in question, a Mr. Konstantin Goloskokov, is quoted as claiming not only that he started the attacks but – and this is the really interesting part – that he enlisted members of a group called Nashe to carry them out. He insists that the decision to do this was spontaneous, not something prompted by orders from the Russian government and that there was nothing illegal about it. It wasn’t a denial of service attack, it was just more service requests than the Estonian servers could handle. The article does not say if he used air quotes or an “end sarcasm” tag when explaining this.
read more »

What do you do if a foreign government attacks your country’s computer systems? In America we apparently throw a lot of money down a hole and then the guy theoretically in charge of defending our networks quits.

Anyone who has followed the news knows this is not a hypothetical question. For example, two years ago when Russia invaded Estonia there was a concurrent denial of service attack across the Internet on Estonian servers. This attack caused communications difficulties that may have affected the Estonia response to the invasion (not that there was ever very much they could do) and even reportedly disrupted such things as ATM transactions (See Russia’s Cyberwar on Estonia)

Recently, a story has been circulating that the Russians have admitted to being behind the Estonian attacks (See Russian politician: ‘My assistant started Estonian cyberwar’). There’s less to this story than meets the eye, though. Sergei Markov, a Russian government official, claimed recently that a deputy (who he conveniently refused to name) of his was outside Russia at the time the war began and started the cyber attacks entirely on his own, as a “reaction from civil society.” Apparently this was meant to indicate that the attacks had nothing to do with any official strategy but were a spontaneous uprising of the proletariat against the reactionary forces etc. etc.

In other words, it sounds like typical old-fashioned Soviet propaganda and just doesn’t pass the smell test. Unless the Russians really want the world to believe that low grade government functionaries often have access to destructive botnets that can be turned against any country that happens to annoy them?
read more »

Where I make snide – I mean informative – comments about stuff that caught my attention, instead of the usual long-winded ranting. I’ve been thinking about this for a while because often I see something, think of a paragraph or two, then get bored and wander away. But maybe sometimes a paragraph or two is enough! First up:

New Test For Detecting Fake Organic Milk

I couldn’t stop laughing when I saw this one. You mean there’s a problem with knock-offs of organic milk? Of course there is! Damn that supply and demand! People are willing to pay extra for a product they can’t identify, it shouldn’t come as a surprise when there are distortions in the market. That’s what art fraud is all about, after all. Tell a collector you’ve discovered a brand new Vermeer, then sit back and watch the bucks roll in because even the experts can’t tell the difference! (It happened during World War 2. See The Forger’s Spell)

Here’s a thought: If you can’t tell the difference, then maybe it’s not worth the extra money.  (The milk, anyway. The fake Vermeer’s in the book I referenced were terrible. The experts were idiots, which is a lesson we’ll go into at great length some other time)
read more »